Flag of Novorossiya

Flag of Novorossiya
Showing posts with label Eduard Basurin. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Eduard Basurin. Show all posts

Saturday, December 31, 2016

Donetsk Defense: Yearly Situation Report, 30.12.2016



  



Donetsk Defense: Yearly Situation Report, 30.12.2016

Friday, December 30, 2016 - 16:39

Good day! Over the past year the DPR People’s Militia has considerably improved its battle training level of its units. There was held the tank biathlon, were forced water barriers and was carried out sea-launched assault. It is only some examples of improving skills and level training of all the categories of the DPR army.

The situation remained tense on the contact line in the Donetsk People’s Republic. The SMM OSCE representatives daily registered absence of heavy weapons of the Armed Forces of Ukraine at special storage sites and it gives evidences of what these weapons were actively used by the Ukrainian command against Donbass civilians.  

During the period from January till December, 2016 the number of violations of the ceasefire regime amounted to 143630 times, including with heavy arms – 78223 times. The total weight of ammunitions launched on the Republic’s territory amounted to two thousand tons.

There were destroyed 820 house-buildings and municipal facilities of the Republic. Vital support facilities and repair brigades, that came to repair damages, were shelled with artillery and mortars. There were registered facts when repair-workers were wounded. Target showing and fire adjustment of artillery and mortar detachment were carried out with the help of unmanned drones, including impact-detonated ones delivered by terrorism supporters, by so-called volunteers.  

The enemy’s forces and facilities, that are concentrated in the conflict zone as on December, 2016, amounted to 32 438 soldiers, 213 tanks, 351 units of artillery weapons of 152mm and 122mm caliber, 198 units of mortars of 82mm and 120mm caliber, 84 units of MRLS and  to 1154 armored combat vehicles.

The military and political leadership of Ukraine did not leave attempts to destabilize the situation in Donbass, despite the commitments taken on complying with the ceasefire regime and even after mutual agreements on ceasing fire, the Ukrainian side kept increasing the number of shellings of the Republic’s territory.

Over the past year we registered over 100 provocations carried out by the Ukrainian military along the contact line associated with attempts to break through our positions. The highest number of such kind of provocations were registered in the 4th quarter of the year, after the situation when the Ministry of Internal Affairs Minister Avakov and Ukraine's National Security and Defense Council Secretary Turchinov gave the order to the National Guard units to solve the conflict by taking Donbass by force.

And despite the fact that the Ukrainian military were rendered assistance in proving the lethal arms and other material things by foreign countries, all the attempts to seize our positions were ineffective and led to the big amount of losses among the military personnel and military hardware of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. The extreme case of such an attempt took place on December, 28 in vicinity of Krutaya Balka where three AFU servicemen died and four were wounded because of unthinking and criminal actions of the Ukrainian command.  

According to the official data of Ukraine’s Defense Ministry, the AFU losses amounted to 214 dead servicemen, and to 1324 wounded in 2016. However, knowing inclination of the Ukrainian military leadership to falsify and conceal data on losses from the community, we can only presuppose the real numbers of the killed and wounded. According to the information of the Ukrainian volunteer organizations and hospital staff of the military hospitals both in the “ATO” zone and in the rear area, the number of the dead amounted to 600 and the wounded to over two thousand.  

The outgoing year was characterized by a new chosen so-called tactics of waging the military actions on the part of the Ukrainian military as in by seizing the localities, being located in the grey zone and this is the rude violation of the Minsk agreements on disengaging sides. By such actions a few goals are pursued. Firstly, by seizing the locality by the Ukrainian side there is announced the so-called another Victory over the enemy without reference to what that the DPR Armed Forces units were absent there. By this the Ukrainian community thinks that the AFU have the alleged successes of the AFU in the “ATO” zone.   

Secondly, the distance between our positions and the positions of the Armed Forces of Ukraine becomes smaller what allows the Ukrainian side to carry out more actively the armed provocations in relation to the DPR Armed Forces.  

However, how hard the Ukrainian military command tried to improve the image of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, they failed to do it. The professional army was replaced by the mercenary army of Poroshenko. The people mobilized, even receiving military actions’ experience, are the worst soldiers ever than the career officers. Besides, a lot of criminals, alcoholics and the needy took arms they only hinder to serve those who still can. The bet on the volunteer battalions led to what these “volunteer soldiers” went out of control from time to time and became additional headache both of a command and of civilians.

We are noting the increased number of grave crimes on the part of the Ukrainian military in relation to civilians. Robberies and even murders, as in case that took place on the checkpoint “Maiorsk” on December, 14 were a common situation on the territory controlled by Ukraine that does not give a prestige and support to the AFU among civilians.

From the beginning of 2016 in the Donetsk People’s Republic at the hand of the Ukrainian punishers there died 314 people, three children were among them. 406 people were differently wounded, 16 children, 323 men and 83 women were among them.

Thus, the military and political situation in 2016 was characterized as difficult and tense. The Ukrainian side still did not leave attempts to escalate the situation in Donbass and solve the conflict by force methods that were roughly suppressed by the People’s Militia.

Next year the system work on preparing servicemen will be continued that is absolutely necessary because the Ukrainian side is not ready for implementing the truce. Such a situation still continues, the DPR People’s Militia will increase its battle skills and guard people’s calm.

Vice-Commander of the DPR People's Militia Eduard Basurin, official translation by DONi News Agency

Monday, June 27, 2016

DEPUTY DEFENSE MINISTER OF THE D.P.R – EDUARD BASURIN (Эдуард Басурин)



Eduard Basurin
 Basurin at a press conference in January 2015
Native name

Эдуард Басурин
Born
27 June 1966 (age 50)
Donetsk, Ukrainian SSR, USSR
Allegiance
Donetsk People's Republic
Service/branch
Years of service
2014–present
Rank
Lieutenant Colonel
Unit
Kalmius Battalion
Battles/wars


Eduard Aleksandrovich Basurin (Russian: Эдуард Александрович Басурин; born 27 June 1966) is Deputy Defence Minister and defence spokesman of the self-proclaimed Donetsk People's Republic. In 2014 he served as a political commissar of the Kalmius Battalion.


Interview is with Colonel Eduard Alexandrovich Basurin
October 11, 2015

Interview by Anatolii Sharii
Transcript and Translation: Alena Scarecrow
Source: https://youtu.be/gz0D3JiZd1M

Basurin on the frozen Novorossiya project, Putin, war and media

This interview is with Colonel Eduard Alexandrovich Basurin, Deputy Corps Commander for personnel and Zakharchenko’s (the head of the Donetsk People’s Republic) assistant on social rights of servicemen and their families.

What was your pre-war occupation?

Business. Polymers and PVC production. My military career started in July 2014; before joining the Corps, I was involved in securing safety of the people arriving to and leaving the region and monitoring humanitarian deliveries.

Have the Ukrainian militia called you in for questioning yet? There are lists of the ones to be questioned, you know.

Waiting on it. They are fighting on two fronts, legally accusing us of terrorism – banditism, probably, or whatever they term it, and also trying to pressure us and our families psychologically. Say, my son regularly gets all sorts of messages on social networks slinging mud at me.

Have any of your Ukrainian friends cut off contact with you?

To begin with, there are not that many friends – real friends; mostly people I have certain common interests with. I am an open person and welcome any communication. I guess there are people avoiding contacts with me now – well, so be it then. I am here, as well as my wife, my children, my parents, who all refused to leave the region choosing to stay by my side; we are here, simple people living for simple but so important things – just like all others around us. I always try to put myself in their place so that to understand what our people need and strive for, and most importantly – how to help them.

You are a public person now. How do you feel about it?

Strange. I still can’t get used to being public – well, not public but recognizable, that’s a better word.

Do you keep an eye on the Ukrainian media?

I try to be in the know and thanks to journalists I always am, even though we are often at loggerheads. They usually ask me to comment on what the Ukrainian officials say. It’s not right and so I tell them – it is the Ukraine who should comment on us, not the other way round. There is something amiss in the very concept of the modern journalism. Journalists used to get to the bottom of things by hook or by crook; they are different now… negligent.

Have there been many journalists denied further accreditation?

There have been some – mostly foreign ones – who were not quite objective in presenting the information in the media, doing that not because they wanted to bend the truth, but rather had to. There are few journalists capable of getting their message across in a “loud and clear” – and above all impartial – way; the vast majority, just like any other employees, have no choice but to play their masters’ game. So the journalists maneuver as best they can between truth, half-truth and pure lie, often choosing to rely on their own assumptions rather than on facts, in case of which we do deny them further accreditation. Journalists’ work is of immense importance, especially when it comes to warfare, and any mistake might have dire consequences. There are lives, human lives at stake here and any word or phrase, if presented in a biased or even ambiguous way, can lead to another tragedy.

What happens if journalists come with no accreditation?

They get detained and passed on to the military headquarters for further investigation. There are strict rules in regards of human safety; these rules are to be abided by.

What do you think of the captives’ exchanges?

There are our people held captive on the other side and it’s the only way we can help them out. There is no such thing as their importance-unimportance, or adequacy-inadequacy of such exchanges. Prisoners – they all differ. War does presume fighting an enemy, but killing an enemy in a fair combat is not the same as murdering adversary’s soldiers in the name of Murder and oppressing civilians, frightening them into obedience at the gunpoint. Such intimidation was the very tactics the Ukrainian nationalistic battalions chose to adopt. So, there’s no talking about any correlativity of exchanges. Civilians frequently fall prisoner too, along with military men. There was a case… They arrested a woman, our woman, the mother of three our soldiers. Could we leave her there? We couldn’t. That’s it. The problem is it has always been very complicated. The Ukraine has always dictated her own terms.

Is it hard to negotiate with the Ukraine?

It is. Very much so. The Ukraine tends to look down on her opponents, refusing to consider them as equals. We have always insisted that no fruitful dialogue is possible unless the parties treat each other as equals. We still have to be heard.

Lots of people are coming back to Donbass. Do you think the curfew will be lifted? Are the “new”-comers likely to have conflicts with the people who had stayed and lived through the bombings?

You see… The people who’ve seen out that nightmare have changed. It might seem paradoxical, but they’ve got gentler… More lenient… Their views and priorities have undoubtedly changed, with spiritual and moral values distinctly outweighing the rest ones. I think the people coming back here to stay will soon get used to the new atmosphere and will easily assimilate if they accept and live by the new rules and regulations that are being implemented. If they don’t, than yes, conflicts might occur.

  

An alley in memory of the fallen defenders of Donbass has been officially opened in the Lenin Komsomol Park in Donetsk.

The event was attended by a few hundred people, including the DPR head Alexander Zakharchenko, Donetsk Mayor Igor Martynov, the Executive Commander of Corps of the DPR Defense Ministry Eduard Basurin, representatives of DPR ministries and departments.


Are you standing for election?

No. I am a military man and I don’t see myself in politics. I believe I can be of greater use to people staying where I am now.

How do you see the future of the Ukraine?

The Ukraine will be the Ukraine. It is only a matter of time. But one thing is certain – the current Kiev government will change. People are bound to understand that the power is in unity. The DPR (Donetsk People’s Republic) is 70-80% Ukrainian – speaking geographically; it might expand and become “the Ukraine”, or merge with the current Ukraine with this new integrity subsequently acquiring some new name or keeping the old one, – time will tell.

Don’t you feel that the “Donbass project” has gone into reverse and the region is being passed back to Kiev’s protectorate?

The main thing we all need to realize is the Ukraine we’ve known has had her day. She is giving her way to a fundamentally different country with a completely new order. What frightens people is the name – the Ukraine – which the vast majority inexorably associate with the current Kiev regime, the regime of repressions, persecution, terror. People who left the area at the start of the warfare fall into two categories – those who simply fled escaping the imminent punishment for the ugly deeds they’d done, and those who took this step in order to save their lives and protect their families. There is another moment… At the referendum held on 11 May 2014 about 90% of the population voted for granting DPR an independent status. They were not barred at the time to express their will and they did. At all events, people consider this area as homeland; they belong here, but we cannot and should not make broad generalizations. What we have now is a broken society of people gone through a terrible experience, through a civil war. Apart from the havoc it has already wrecked there will inevitably arise other, more distant but no less dire consequences, such as social divisions and clashes between different groups of the population – between people supporting newly established regulations and their opponents, hindering them. Only a dialogue, words can resolve conflicts. Words and truth.

You do not seem to relish the idea of the dissolution of the Ukraine, do you?

Nobody does. Neither Russia, nor Europe, nor even the United States. I won’t vouch for the latter, though. It’s in America’s interests to keep on destabilizing the region, kindling indignation and fanning intolerance so that to be able to spark off a conflict in case she finds it necessary – be that to enhance her control of the situation or wage new hostilities. Such a provoked conflict can take any form, from a demonstration to, say, that nonsense we all are witnessing now with the Ukraine cutting off transport communication with Russia – first flights, that have already been banned, then railway and road connection that might well follow. But… people are tired of lies – people there, on the other side. Poroshenko declared at the last UN assembly that the number of poor people in the Ukraine has reduced by a factor of three. Yes… People are tired of lies…

What do you think is Putin’s ultimate objective?

He is trying to restore Russia to her former glory, like it was in the Tsarist times when the Russian Empire was the power to be reckoned with. Some choose to talk big. He acts big. That is the only right path.

Is there a politician in the Ukraine you respect?

There isn’t. Really, there isn’t. Designers tailored the Ukrainian suit right and tight, with no space left inside for worthy ones. Politicians there are skilled at drawing communicative barriers and propagating their “truths” by all possible means whenever a smallest opportunity arises. Say, it’s not a secret that prices for foods and transport here in our region are higher that in the Ukraine – for evident reasons. Even this fact the Ukraine turns into a tool for manipulating people’s consciousness – a sort of “See? You’ll get the same if you support those on the other side of the fence”. People willing to say the truth, so needful truth are hushed. This is the ideology that currently reins and is echoed on all those their TCN, ACTV, STB and other TV channels. Their ability to awaken patriotism is impressive. “Here is this brave Ukrainian soldier. He is defending his Motherland. He is defending his family” they said. A great move. Or that “Russian aggression” they invented, when Russia allegedly snatched a piece of the Ukrainian territory, the DPR/LPR that is, sent in her troops and so on as the story goes. That is how they serve it to their people and their people sincerely believe it. Even for her Crimean “intervention” Russia is less attacked than for “conquering” Donbass.

Speaking of Crimea, many see its current “blockade” as an attempt to kill Ukrainian business.

Well, business people, even if enemies, come to see eye to eye and find some common ground much faster and easier than politicians. Money is a unifying factor. Left to their own devices – without politicians’ interference – entrepreneurs will always get to cooperate and think up a way out.

Have you ever apologized to journalists?

Not exactly. But there are a lot of interesting things happening here, what with distortion of facts, subtitling our videos in a weird manner etc. Turning back to media… I wish I could always have several different TV channels on – for one thing, it’s curious to get one and the same item of news presented in all imaginable and unimaginable ways, from all sorts of angles; for the other, it’s useful for it allows to foresee their further moves. As for the Internet, it bristles with tales rather than facts. I understand how confused people are trying to cope with the informational flow flooding them. Take the so-called First Maydan of 2004, for example, when they wanted to change Kuchma’s regime which many businesses found suffocating. That is the reason Yanukovich lost people’s support – the “family” as they called themselves, the elite, turned into assets usurpers, which caused business circles’ indignation with subsequent riots. Yanukovich actually has his hands stained in blood, because it was in his power to nip that turmoil in the bud. As for Kuchma, he just preferred to bury his head in the sand… Lord is their judge. That Orange revolution plunged the country into chaos which further exacerbated with sheer ignoramuses coming to power, which adversely affected living standards of people and bred social insecurity. Things got polished and somewhat straightened out in time, and now it’s recurring again. It’s so sad that people won’t learn from history…

What is your opinion of Strelkov (former Defense Minister of the DPR) and his statements?

The thing is how can we be sure that he really said all that’s been ascribed to him? The videos Strelkov is in are often inconsistent with the written transcripts accompanying them. Either way, I have mixed feelings about this person. Let’s just say that he played a certain role in the history of the DPR and his work is now done. Regarding his current views and statements, I prefer not to focus on them leaving them to his own discretion. Besides, we get to see him far less now than we used to – Strelkov is sinking into oblivion, just like the Novorossiya project. It’s been quite a long time since I last heard this notion – Novorossiya – from any of the Russian politicians.

Will there be another project to replace the Novorossiya one?

I don’t know. Nobody does. There is a certain unity with Donetsk and Lugansk as its nuclear, the unity that used to be thought of as “Novorossiya”. It never got any official status, so there’s no such thing as Novorossiya now. Igor Plotnitskiy (the head of the LPR – Lugansk People’s Republic) might have some ideas on that score, but I am not in a position to comment on them; I do not know him so well – either as a person or as a politician – as to attempt to predict what his ambitions might guide him to.

Is it true that some companies in the area under your control pay taxes to the Ukraine?

It’s true. And it’s another consequence of the civil war that’s torn the country apart. You see, the Ukraine found herself in a unique situation, unique in the sense that nothing of the kind has ever happened before. So now there are quite a few companies having their head offices there in the Ukraine and branches here on our territory. I’ve heard the Ukraine is going to tighten her grip over such companies – “Oh, you pay taxes both here and there? Deep pockets you have? Then share”. We are all to blame for the current state of things; it was us who let them happen. We are all guilty and it’s because of us – every one of us – that people are suffering now. There, on the other side, it’s the same. People yield to manipulation too easily… It often comes to the point of absurdity when, say, the Ukraine threatens to lock a person up in jail for some 5-8 years in case they refuse to join the army and they do join, they do choose to turn into murderers rather than become a prisoner. Crippled human minds – that’s what this war’s done.

Commentary by The Saker: at a time when, much to my regret, Strelkov and others are making regular hyperbolic and generally over the top statements on a regular basis, it is good to hear from a man who is level headed.  Please pay special attention to the parts of his replies which I have bolded our in red above.  This is the first semi-official explanation of what I believe the project has been all along: not just to protect the people of the Donbass, which was always a necessary first step, but never an end goal, but to regime change the Ukraine into a fundamentally different Ukraine.  There never was a viable option just to “bite off” Crimea and the Donbass and then accept a Nazi Ukraine run by NATO.  The only possible end goal is to at the very least secure a non-Nazi, neutral, federative Ukraine.  If the plan is to break it up, then much more than just the Donbass needs to go to Russia (at the very least all the southern seashore and all of the Donetsk and Lugansk regions).  Either way as long as “Novorussia” is confined to the current size of the Lugansk and Donetsk Republics it leaves too much of the Ukraine to the Nazis.  This is why the “Novorussian” project is currently “frozen”.  This is why Basurin says that the name “the Ukraine” can mean very different thing and why he says that Putin has a grand project for Russia.  Read between the lines, and it is all there.  Coming from the mouth of the DNR spokesman.