Russian
President Vladimir Putin gave a speech on justice for the slain pilot.
INTERNET
SOURCE: http://www.sott.net/article/307822-Putin-will-seek-justice-not-revenge-for-slain-pilot-Peshkov
Putin will seek justice, not revenge for slain pilot Peshkov
Mike Whitney
Counterpunch
Fri, 04 Dec 2015 03:18 UTC
Counterpunch
Fri, 04 Dec 2015 03:18 UTC
“Terrorism has once again shown it is
prepared deliberately to stop at nothing in creating human victims. An end must
be put to this. As never before, it is vital to unite forces of the entire
world community against terror.”
[PHOTO SOURCE: http://www.azquotes.com/quote/237304]
|
"You can
pay me now or pay me later" is an American expression that means that you
can either deal with a particular problem immediately at minimal expense or
wait until the problem gets really bad and the costs go through the roof. This
is the message that Russian President Vladimir Putin has been trying to get
across to Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan for more than a week. In fact,
the whole smear campaign connecting Erdogan to the ISIS oil smuggling racket
was designed to shame Erdogan into "doing the right thing" and
apologizing for the downing of its Su-24 warplane. What Putin wants, is quite simple. He
wants Erdogan to admit that what he did was wrong and take the necessary steps
to make amends.
What Putin is doing is no different than what any parent would do if their son was throwing sand in the face of some other child on the playground He would take little Johnny by the arm, tell him to stop what he was doing, and make him apologize to the person he hurt. This basic learning experience provides the moral foundation for broader human interaction. If people are allowed to simply run roughshod over others - even to the point where they are willing to kill them to achieve their political objectives - then none of us are ever going to be safe. So Erdogan needs to face the music, apologize, and take his medicine like a man.
But, of course, an apology doesn't change the fact that a man is dead. And not only a man, but a Russian soldier. That means something. That puts the onus on Putin to seek justice for a hero who died while fighting for his country. Americans don't understand this because America is always at war. In fact, American history is one long 240-year carnage-generating bloodbath from Bunker Hill to Baghdad, from Wounded Knee to Haditha. As a result, America has to conceal its casualties from public view to the extent that even photographing the flag-draped coffins delivered to Dover Airbase has been banned. That's how Sparta prevents the people from seeing the enormous costs of its so called interventions.
Russia is different. Russians don't like war, and war is not a permanent feature in Russian life. So when a pilot is killed in action, the entire country grieves which is exactly what happened when the remains of Lieutenant Colonel Oleg Peshkov were returned from Syria to Moscow. It was a day of national mourning.
Now the ball is in Putin's court. Now it is incumbent on him, as a responsible and moral leader, to seek justice for Peshkov, which means that, first of all, he must persuade Erdogan must acknowledge his mistake and apologize. Secondly, there has to be some tangible effort to make amends. It's Putin's responsibility to demand accountability, not revenge. And that's what he's doing. Putin has already stated in blunt terms that he is NOT going to let this thing slide. There will be payback, that much is certain.
In order to understand how strongly Putin feels about the matter and, also, how strongly he feels about Russia's mission in Syria, here's an excerpt from the State of the State speech he gave just this week:
What Putin is doing is no different than what any parent would do if their son was throwing sand in the face of some other child on the playground He would take little Johnny by the arm, tell him to stop what he was doing, and make him apologize to the person he hurt. This basic learning experience provides the moral foundation for broader human interaction. If people are allowed to simply run roughshod over others - even to the point where they are willing to kill them to achieve their political objectives - then none of us are ever going to be safe. So Erdogan needs to face the music, apologize, and take his medicine like a man.
But, of course, an apology doesn't change the fact that a man is dead. And not only a man, but a Russian soldier. That means something. That puts the onus on Putin to seek justice for a hero who died while fighting for his country. Americans don't understand this because America is always at war. In fact, American history is one long 240-year carnage-generating bloodbath from Bunker Hill to Baghdad, from Wounded Knee to Haditha. As a result, America has to conceal its casualties from public view to the extent that even photographing the flag-draped coffins delivered to Dover Airbase has been banned. That's how Sparta prevents the people from seeing the enormous costs of its so called interventions.
Russia is different. Russians don't like war, and war is not a permanent feature in Russian life. So when a pilot is killed in action, the entire country grieves which is exactly what happened when the remains of Lieutenant Colonel Oleg Peshkov were returned from Syria to Moscow. It was a day of national mourning.
Now the ball is in Putin's court. Now it is incumbent on him, as a responsible and moral leader, to seek justice for Peshkov, which means that, first of all, he must persuade Erdogan must acknowledge his mistake and apologize. Secondly, there has to be some tangible effort to make amends. It's Putin's responsibility to demand accountability, not revenge. And that's what he's doing. Putin has already stated in blunt terms that he is NOT going to let this thing slide. There will be payback, that much is certain.
In order to understand how strongly Putin feels about the matter and, also, how strongly he feels about Russia's mission in Syria, here's an excerpt from the State of the State speech he gave just this week:
"Russia has demonstrated immense responsibility and leadership in the fight against terrorism. Russian people have supported these resolute actions. The firm stance taken by our people stems from a thorough understanding of the absolute danger of terrorism, from patriotism, high moral qualities and their firm belief that we must defend our national interests, history, traditions and values.
The international community should have learned from the past lessons. The historical parallels in this case are undeniable. Unwillingness to join forces against Nazism in the 20th century cost us millions of lives in the bloodiest world war in human history.
Today we have again come face to face with a destructive and barbarous ideology, and we must not allow these modern-day dark forces to attain their goals." (Russian President Vladimir Putin's Annual Presidential Address to the Federal Assembly, St George Hall, Moscow)
Does that
sound like a man who is waffling about his commitment in Syria? Does that sound
like a man who has any reservations at all about the moral righteousness of his
cause?
Again, Russia is not America. The war on terror is not a scam to enhance presidential powers, to curtail civil liberties, to perpetuate America's wars around the planet, and to reduce the public to quivering, malleable, propagandized imbeciles wailing for the protection of the all-powerful state. Russia's approach to terrorism is entirely different. It's constructive and, more important, it's rational. Putin doesn't divide terrorists into good terrorists and bad terrorists, moderate terrorist's and radical terrorists. If they're terrorists, they're terrorists regardless of their pedigree and regardless of whether they serve the geopolitical objectives the state or not. They're enemy and they're going to be killed. End of story. Here's how Putin summed it up:
Again, Russia is not America. The war on terror is not a scam to enhance presidential powers, to curtail civil liberties, to perpetuate America's wars around the planet, and to reduce the public to quivering, malleable, propagandized imbeciles wailing for the protection of the all-powerful state. Russia's approach to terrorism is entirely different. It's constructive and, more important, it's rational. Putin doesn't divide terrorists into good terrorists and bad terrorists, moderate terrorist's and radical terrorists. If they're terrorists, they're terrorists regardless of their pedigree and regardless of whether they serve the geopolitical objectives the state or not. They're enemy and they're going to be killed. End of story. Here's how Putin summed it up:
"The terrorists must not be given refuge anywhere. There must be no double standards. No contacts with terrorist organizations. No attempts to use them for self-seeking goals. No criminal business with terrorists.
We know who are stuffing pockets in Turkey and letting terrorists prosper from the sale of oil they stole in Syria. The terrorists are using these receipts to recruit mercenaries, buy weapons and plan inhuman terrorist attacks against Russian citizens and against people in France, Lebanon, Mali and other states. We remember that the militants who operated in the North Caucasus in the 1990s and 2000s found refuge and received moral and material assistance in Turkey. We still find them there." (Russian President Vladimir Putin's Annual Presidential Address to the Federal Assembly, St George Hall, Moscow)
So Putin has
known all along that Erdogan's group of fanatical Islamic zealots were
overseeing a vast criminal enterprise, but he kept his mouth shut.
Why?
Well, because Putin is discreet. He doesn't believe that publicly humiliating other world leaders is a positive way to conduct business. Keep in mind, that even though the Russian military has produced tons of evidence connecting Turkey to the illicit sale of stolen oil produced by ISIS, they haven't once mentioned that Israel has been on the receiving end of many of these transactions. In other words, Putin doesn't blow the whistle on people unless they force him to do so. Erdogan forced him to do so. Erdogan crossed the line. Erdogan "stabbed him in the back." Just listen:
Why?
Well, because Putin is discreet. He doesn't believe that publicly humiliating other world leaders is a positive way to conduct business. Keep in mind, that even though the Russian military has produced tons of evidence connecting Turkey to the illicit sale of stolen oil produced by ISIS, they haven't once mentioned that Israel has been on the receiving end of many of these transactions. In other words, Putin doesn't blow the whistle on people unless they force him to do so. Erdogan forced him to do so. Erdogan crossed the line. Erdogan "stabbed him in the back." Just listen:
"The Turkish people are kind, hardworking and talented. We have many good and reliable friends in Turkey. Allow me to emphasize that they should know that we do not equate them with the certain part of the current ruling establishment that is directly responsible for the deaths of our servicemen in Syria.
We will never forget their collusion with terrorists. We have always deemed betrayal the worst and most shameful thing to do, and that will never change. I would like them to remember this - those in Turkey who shot our pilots in the back, those hypocrites who tried to justify their actions and cover up for terrorists." ("Russian President Vladimir Putin's Annual Presidential Address")
Erdogan
is going to pay for what he did, but that doesn't mean that Putin is going to
be irrational about it. The man is not a loose cannon and, besides, this isn't
about revenge, it's about justice for Peshkov. Here's Putin again:
"Our actions will always be guided primarily by responsibility - to ourselves, to our country, to our people. We are not going to rattle the sabre. But, if someone thinks they can commit a heinous war crime, kill our people and get away with it, suffering nothing but a ban on tomato imports, or a few restrictions in construction or other industries, they're delusional. We'll remind them of what they did, more than once. They'll regret it. We know what to do." ("Russian President Vladimir Putin's Annual Presidential Address")
Isn't
this how leaders are supposed to behave? Shouldn't we expect that our leaders
place the security of their people and military personnel above everything
else? Shouldn't that be their highest priority?
Of course, it should be. It goes without saying. What Putin is saying is that no one is going to kill a Russian citizen without being held accountable. Period. You have to admire that.
Now compare Putin's reaction to the killing of Peshkov to 9-11 where the US government prevented an official investigation for more than a year and then packed the investigative committee with cronies, sycophants and ideologues who could be trusted to spin a sanitized version of events that only a moron would believe. The whole manner in which the investigation was conducted tells us everything we need to know about the contempt the USG has for American people, their safety and security don't make a damn bit of difference to the people in Washington. It's a big joke.
Things are different in Russia, at least under Putin they are. And this explains why Putin's public approval ratings are in the stratosphere, well above 80 percent even though the economy is still in the dumps.
But how can that be when all the brainiacs in the western media said his numbers would tank for standing up to the US in Ukraine?
It's because the Russian people know he's a straight-shooter who puts the interests of his people above his own. It's also because they understand that they are in a generation-long struggle with the US to maintain their sovereign independence and to create a multipolar world where one center of power does not dictate to others what they can and can't do. They seem to grasp that the war on terror is really a war for global domination. They "get it". Here's Putin again:
"Terrorism is a growing threat today. The Afghanistan problem has not been resolved. The situation there is alarming and gives us no optimism, while some of the yet recently stable and rather well-doing countries in the Middle East and North Africa - Iraq, Libya and Syria - have now plunged into chaos and anarchy that pose a threat to the whole world.
We all know why that happened. We know who decided to oust the unwanted regimes and brutally impose their own rules. Where has this led them? They stirred up trouble, destroyed the country's statehood, set people against each other, and then "washed their hands", as we say in Russia, thus opening the way to radical activists, extremists and terrorists." ("Russian President Vladimir Putin's Annual Presidential Address")
You see, this
isn't just about Turkey or Erdogan or even the downing of the Su-24. This is a full-blown war between
Russia and the Terrorist States of America, the petri dish from
whence this lethal virus has emerged and spread from North Africa, across the
Middle East and deep into Central Asia.
Putin, at great risk to himself and his country, has reluctantly taken on the
task of fighting this noxious menace before it infects the entire world,
and now others are following his lead.
Putin again:
Putin again:
"The militants in Syria pose a particularly high threat for
Russia. Many of them are citizens of Russia and the CIS countries. They get
money and weapons and build up their strength. If they get sufficiently strong
to win there, they will return to their home countries to sow fear and hatred,
to blow up, kill and torture people. We must fight and eliminate them there,
away from home."
This
isn't a war Putin wants to fight. He was perfectly content selling gas and oil
to the Europeans; raking in tons of money, rebuilding his country, beefing up
Russian GDP, and watching while standards of living steadily improved. But what
choice did he have? Washington decided that Putin's dream of a free trade zone
from Lisbon to Vladivostok - with oil and gas denominated in euros instead of
the almighty dollar - was a threat to US dominance so they decided to put an
end to it. They toppled the Moscow-friendly government in Ukraine and replaced
it with a US-backed stooge, tried to torpedo Russia's gas trade with the EU,
and then spread the war to Syria by recruiting, arming, training, and funding
fanatical mercenaries whose assignment was to topple Bashar al Assad and leave
the state in Dresden-type ruination. Isn't that Washington's basic blueprint
for success, destroy everything that can't be used to increase its own
stranglehold on power?
This is what makes Erdogan's betrayal so bitter; it's because Erdogan knows what Putin is doing in Syria. He's not trying to recreate the Russian Empire. That's baloney. He's involved in an existential struggle for Russia's survival. Erdogan knows that but, even so, he has thus aligned himself with Washington and entrusted his country's future to an organization that is nothing more than a Mafia protection racket, NATO. Is it any wonder why Putin is pissed?
Here's what needs to happen now: Erdogan needs to see that his dependence on the US and NATO is going to come at a very high cost for himself and his country, after all, Washington knows that they have Erdogan over a barrel and they will certainly exploit that in every way possible. For one thing, Erdogan will be expected to take orders from Washington just like all the other US puppets. He's not going to like that.
Second, Turkey is not going to be the EU's gas hub now that Putin has put the kibosh on Turkstream. The hostility between Turkey and Russia will likely impact Iran's decision to use Turkey as a transit site for Iranian gas too. In other words, by refusing to apologize, Erdogan has compromised not only its country's independence, but damaged its long-term economic prospects that are part-and-parcel of its advantageous strategic location which puts Turkey at the epicenter of the world, the de facto landbridge between Europe and Asia. Erdogan has sacrificed all that to preserve his felonious ISIS oil smuggling operation and to continue to support his loser-terrorist buddies that are decimating Syria.
All this could be reversed with a simple apology and by meeting Putin's reasonable demands for making amends.
And what would Putin's demands be?
Most likely, Putin would insist that Erdogan stop all support for anti-regime forces now operating in Syria. That's number one.
Number two: Erdogan would be asked to actively and sincerely encourage leaders of the anti-regime militias to accept the terms of an immediate ceasefire and to participate in negotiations for a political settlement to the four and a half year-long war.
Putin has never lost sight of his primary goals which are to prevent regime change, to maintain the sovereign integrity of the state, and to kill or capture all terrorists operating in Syria. If Erdogan agreed to these terms, Putin will have achieved all of his objectives; displaced Syrians will be able to return home, life will gradually return to normal, and Peshkov will have gotten the justice he deserves.
Mike Whitney lives in Washington state. He is a contributor to Hopeless: Barack Obama and the Politics of Illusion (AK Press).
“Russia doesn't negotiate with terrorists. It
destroys them.”
[PHOTO SOURCE: http://izquotes.com/quote/260707]
|
INTERNET
SOURCE: http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/50864
Presidential Address to the Federal Assembly
Vladimir Putin delivered the Annual
Presidential Address to the Federal Assembly. The Address was
traditionally delivered at the Kremlin’s St George Hall before
an audience of more than 1,000 people.
December 3, 2015
13:00
The Kremlin, Moscow
Those
present for the Address included members of the Federation
Council, State Duma deputies, members of the Government, heads
of the Constitutional and Supreme Courts, regional governors,
heads of regional legislative assemblies, heads of Russia’s
traditional religious faiths, public figures, including heads of regional
civis chambers, and the heads of Russia’s biggest media outlets.
*
* *
President of Russia Vladimir Putin: Citizens
of Russia, members of the Federation Council, State Duma
deputies,
I would
like to begin my Address with words of gratitude
to the Russian servicemen who are fighting international terrorism.
Today
here in the St George’s Hall, a historic hall of Russian
military glory, we have combat pilots and representatives
of the Armed Forces who are taking part
in the anti-terrorist operation in Syria.
Gelena
Peshkova and Irina Pozynich, who lost their husbands in the war
against terror, have joined us too. My deepest respect to you
and the parents of our heroes.
I would
like us all to honour the memory of the soldiers who gave
their lives while doing their duty, and the memory of all
Russian citizens who fell at the hands of terrorists.
(Moment of silence)
Colleagues,
Russia
has long been at the forefront of the fight against
terrorism. This is a fight for freedom, truth and justice,
for the lives of people and the future
of the entire civilisation.
We
know what aggression of international terrorism is. Russia faced it back
in the mid-1990s, when our country, our civilian population suffered
from cruel attacks. We will never forget the hostage crises
in Budennovsk, Beslan and Moscow, the merciless explosions
in residential buildings, the Nevsky Express train derailment,
the blasts in the Moscow metro and Domodedovo Airport.
These
tragedies took thousands of lives. We still grieve for them
and will always grieve, along with the victims’ loved ones.
It
took us nearly a decade to finally break the backbone of those
militants. We almost succeeded in expelling terrorists from Russia, but
are still fighting the remaining terrorist underground. This evil is still
out there. Two years ago, two attacks were committed in Volgograd.
A civilian Russian plane was recently blown up over Sinai.
International
terrorism will never be defeated by just one country, especially
in a situation when the borders are practically open,
and the world is going through another resettlement of peoples,
while terrorists are getting regular financial support.
Terrorism
is a growing threat today. The Afghanistan problem has not been
resolved. The situation there is alarming and gives us no optimism,
while some of the yet recently stable and rather well-doing
countries in the Middle East and North Africa – Iraq, Libya
and Syria – have now plunged into chaos and anarchy that pose
a threat to the whole world.
We
all know why that happened. We know who decided to oust the unwanted
regimes and brutally impose their own rules. Where has this led them? They
stirred up trouble, destroyed the countries’ statehood, set people against
each other, and then “washed their hands”, as we say in Russia,
thus opening the way to radical activists, extremists
and terrorists.
The militants
in Syria pose a particularly high threat for Russia. Many
of them are citizens of Russia and the CIS countries. They
get money and weapons and build up their strength. If they get
sufficiently strong to win there, they will return to their home
countries to sow fear and hatred, to blow up, kill
and torture people. We must fight and eliminate them there, away from
home.
This
is why it has been decided to launch a military operation there based
on an official request from the legitimate Syrian authorities.
Our military personnel are fighting in Syria for Russia,
for the security of Russian citizens.
The Russian
Army and Navy have convincingly demonstrated their combat readiness
and their increased capabilities. Modern Russian weapons have proved
to be effective, and the invaluable practice of using them
in combat conditions is being analysed and will be used
to further improve our weapons and military equipment. We are
grateful to our engineers, workers and all other personnel
of our defence companies.
Russia
has demonstrated immense responsibility and leadership
in the fight against terrorism. Russian people have supported these
resolute actions. The firm stance taken by our people stems from
a thorough understanding of the absolute danger of terrorism,
from patriotism, high moral qualities and their firm belief that we must
defend our national interests, history, traditions and values.
The international
community should have learned from the past lessons. The historical
parallels in this case are undeniable.
Unwillingness
to join forces against Nazism in the 20th century
cost us millions of lives in the bloodiest world war
in human history.
Today
we have again come face to face with a destructive and barbarous
ideology, and we must not allow these modern-day dark forces
to attain their goals.
We
must stop our debates and forget our differences to build
a common anti-terrorist front that will act in line with
international law and under the UN aegis.
Every
civilised country must contribute to the fight against terrorism,
reaffirming their solidarity, not in word but in deed.
This
means that the terrorists must not be given refuge anywhere. There must be
no double standards. No contacts with terrorist organisations. No attempts
to use them for self-seeking goals. No criminal business with terrorists.
We
know who are stuffing pockets in Turkey and letting terrorists
prosper from the sale of oil they stole in Syria.
The terrorists are using these receipts to recruit mercenaries, buy
weapons and plan inhuman terrorist attacks against Russian citizens
and against people in France, Lebanon, Mali and other states. We
remember that the militants who operated in the North Caucasus
in the 1990s and 2000s found refuge and received moral
and material assistance in Turkey. We still find them there.
Meanwhile,
the Turkish people are kind, hardworking and talented. We have many
good and reliable friends in Turkey. Allow me to emphasise that
they should know that we do not equate them with the certain part
of the current ruling establishment that is directly responsible
for the deaths of our servicemen in Syria.
We
will never forget their collusion with terrorists. We have always deemed
betrayal the worst and most shameful thing to do, and that
will never change. I would like them to remember this – those
in Turkey who shot our pilots in the back, those hypocrites who
tried to justify their actions and cover up for terrorists.
I don’t
even understand why they did it. Any issues they might have had, any problems,
any disagreements even those we knew nothing about could have been settled
in a different way. Plus, we were ready to cooperate with Turkey
on all the most sensitive issues it had; we were willing to go
further, where its allies refused to go. Allah only knows, I suppose,
why they did it. And probably, Allah has decided to punish
the ruling clique in Turkey by taking their mind
and reason.
But,
if they expected a nervous or hysterical reaction from us, if they
wanted to see us become a danger to ourselves as much
as to the world, they won’t get it. They won’t get any response
meant for show or even for immediate political gain. They won’t
get it.
Our
actions will always be guided primarily by responsibility –
to ourselves, to our country, to our people. We are not going
to rattle the sabre. But, if someone thinks they can commit
a heinous war crime, kill our people and get away with it, suffering
nothing but a ban on tomato imports, or a few restrictions
in construction or other industries, they’re delusional. We’ll remind
them of what they did, more than once. They’ll regret it. We know what
to do.
We
have mobilised our Armed Forces, security services and law enforcement
agencies to repel the terrorist threat. Everyone must be aware
of their responsibility, including the authorities, political
parties, civil society organisations and the media.
Russia’s
strength lies in the free development of all its peoples, its
diversity, the harmony of cultures, languages and traditions,
mutual respect for and dialogue between all faiths, including
Christians, Muslims, Judaists and Buddhists.
We
must firmly resist any manifestation of extremism and xenophobia
while defending our ethnic and religious accord, which is
the historical foundation of our society and the Russian
statehood.
In 2016 we
will hold elections to the State Duma. I would like
to remind party leaders, all participants of the upcoming
election campaign and all the social and political forces about
the following words of our famous historian, Nikolai Karamzin: “Those
who have no respect for themselves cannot hope to be respected
by others. That does not mean that love for our homeland must blind
us into saying that we are better than all others in everything we do. But
Russians must know their value.”
Yes,
we can debate ways to solve this or that issue. But we must remain
united and remember what is most important for us: Russia.
The election
campaign must be honest and transparent and respect the law
and the electorate. At the same time, it must be conducted
so as to win public trust in the election results
and legitimacy.
Colleagues,
I expect that a considerable part of the parliamentary
candidates’ election programmes will be devoted to the issue
of corruption, which is a major concern for society. Corruption
is hindering Russia’s development.
Officials,
judges, law enforcement officers and deputies at all levels are
obliged to submit their income and expense declarations
and declare their property and assets, including outside Russia.
From
now on, state and municipal officials will also have to disclose
information about the contracts they plan to sign with
the companies of their relatives and friends. Situations with
a possible conflict of interest will be closely monitored by the regulatory
and law enforcement authorities, as well as civil society.
Just
recently participants in the Russian Popular Front’s project
For Fair Public Procurement told me about the instances of abuse
and blatant violations they have uncovered. I ask the Prosecutor
General’s Office and the law enforcement authorities to promptly
react to this information.
The law
must be hard on those who are guilty of premeditated crimes against
human lives and the interests of society
and the state. But the law must be lenient to those who
have slipped up.
Today,
nearly half of the criminal cases brought to court concern petty
crimes or misdemeanours, but those who committed them, including very
young people, go to prison for them.
A prison
term and even a prison record usually have a highly negative
impact on these people’s lives, often creating a situation
in which they commit new crimes.
I ask
the State Duma to approve the Supreme Court’s proposal that some
offences in the Criminal Code are decriminalised and that
misdemeanour is reclassified as an administrative offence, with
an important reservation: a repeated offence must be classified
as a criminal act.
We
must also work to enhance the independence and objectivity
of our courts. In light of this, I suggest strengthening
the role of juries and expanding the list of crimes
that can be submitted to them. It’s not always easy to find 12
jurors, and although I know the position of human rights
organisations, which insist on 12-member juries, forming such juries is
not easy and it is also expensive. Therefore, I suggest cutting
the number of jury members from 12 to 5–7,
on the condition that they take their decisions autonomously
and independently.
Colleagues,
last year we faced some serious economic challenges. Oil and other
products we traditionally offer for export fell in price.
The access of Russian financial institutions and companies
to global financial markets was restricted.
I know
that many people are experiencing hardships today. These economic issues are
affecting incomes and the general quality of life. I understand
very well that people are wondering when we are going to overcome these
hardships and what needs to be done in order to accomplish
this.
The current
situation is complicated but, as I have said before, not critical.
In fact, we can already see some positive trends. Industrial production
and the national currency are generally steady. There is
a slight decline in inflation. We can see a significantly lower
capital flight as compared to 2014.
However,
this doesn’t mean that we just calm down and wait for everything
to miraculously change, or that we can just sit quietly
in expectation of rising oil prices. Essentially, such
an approach would be unacceptable.
We
must be prepared for low commodity prices and external restrictions
to last much longer. By changing nothing, we will simply run out
of reserves and the economic growth rates will linger around
zero.
This
is not the only issue to consider. Busy with the immediate
tasks, we must not overlook general global development trends. The global
economy is rapidly changing shape. New trade associations are forming. We are
experiencing a period of radical change in the sphere
of technology.
This
is a crucial moment when countries need to compete to secure
their roles in the global division of labour for decades
ahead. We can and must become one of the leaders.
Russia
has no right to be vulnerable. We must have a strong economy, excel
in technology and advance our professional skills. We must fully use
our current advantages, as there are no guarantees that we will have them
tomorrow.
Clearly,
the authorities must hear the public out and explain
the nature of the problems people face and the reasons
behind the government’s actions, treating civil society and business
as equal partners.
What
areas should we focus on?
First,
competitive manufacturing is still concentrated mostly
in the commodities and mining sector. We’ll only be able
to achieve our ambitious goals in security and social
development, to create modern jobs and improve the living
standards of millions of our people if we change the structure
of our economy.
Importantly,
we do have effective industrial and agricultural operations, as well
as small and medium-sized businesses. Our goal is to have
the number of these kinds of companies grow fast in all
sectors. Our programmes for import substitution and export support,
manufacturing retrofitting and professional training should be geared
to achieving this goal.
Second,
we need to bear in mind that a number of industries are now
at risk, including primarily the construction, automotive,
and light industries, as well as railway engineering.
To address this, the Government will need to come up with
special support programmes. Financial resources for this purpose have been
set aside.
Third.
It is imperative to support low-income households and socially
vulnerable groups of citizens, and finally adopt fair principles
of providing social assistance that is made available to those who
really need it. In particular, it is necessary to take into account
the individual needs of people with disabilities, and focus
on their training and employment.
We
have done a lot to improve demography, education,
and healthcare. The key benchmarks in these areas were outlined
in the corresponding executive orders of May 2012. Of course,
life is ever changing, and, given current complications, our responsibility
for people’s welfare only increases, so I’d like to ask you
to take these executive orders seriously. We must strive to fulfil
them.
Fourth,
it is imperative to achieve a balanced budget. This, of course,
is not an end in itself, but a critical prerequisite
for macroeconomic stability and our financial independence.
As you may recall, by the end of the 2016 federal budget
year, the deficit should not exceed 3 percent, even if revenue is lower
than expected. Please take a note of this, colleagues, members
of the State Duma and the Federation Council,
the Federal Assembly in general. This is important. I just
mentioned that financial stability and the independence of our
country are completely interrelated. Please keep these basic considerations
in mind.
Budget
planning, in fact, planning each budget cycle must begin with a clear
identification of priorities. We must make government programmes play the decisive
role in this process again. It is essential that we tighten our control
over public funds, including federal and regional subsidies
to industrial and agricultural enterprises. I believe that they
should be transferred to the end user only through treasury accounts.
Government revenue must be used strictly as planned. ”Grey“ schemes used
in paying customs duties, excise taxes on alcohol, tobacco,
and fuels and lubricants siphon off hundreds of billions
of rubles from the budget annually. This is outright theft.
I propose
forming a single system for administering tax, customs and other
fiscal payments. There are a variety of options to go about
this, and we have discussed them on many occasions. I expect the Government
to submit specific proposals. Here again, I would like
to emphasise that the tax environment for business should remain
unchanged in the coming years.
Fifth.
We need to further strengthen trust between the Government
and business, to improve the business climate in Russia.
This
year we have mostly completed the plans outlined in the national
entrepreneurial initiative. The dynamics are good, but we certainly
shouldn’t stop yet.
The Government,
together with the Agency for Strategic Initiatives and leading
business associations, should continue their systematic work to improve
the conditions for doing business, constantly monitoring how laws are
carried out locally.
I believe
free enterprise to be the most important aspect of economic
and social well-being. Entrepreneurial freedom is something we need
to expand to respond to all attempts to impose restrictions
on us.
That
is why we have given such a broad authority to the newly created
Federal Corporation for the Development of Small and Medium
Business. I would like to ask all ministries, departments, governors,
heads of all Russian regions, state-owned companies and banks
to provide all the necessary assistance to it.
Polls
show that businesses see no qualitative progress in the regulators’
work. Yet, all the necessary instructions for this have been issued,
even more than once. We repeat ourselves and our attempts to reduce
their powers. We reduce them in one area – they simply grow again
in another. A whole army of inspectors continues to hinder
the operation of good businesses. I am not saying that control
is not necessary. Business does require regulation. But I ask
the Government Commission for Administrative Reform to work out,
together with business associations, proposals on eliminating redundant
and overlapping functions of regulatory agencies, and submit
them by July 1, 2016.
I would
like to cite some figures supplied by one of our business
associations. During 2014, the investigative authorities opened nearly
200,000 cases on so-called economic crimes. But only 46,000 of 200,000
cases were actually taken to court, and 15,000 cases were thrown out
during the hearings. Simple math suggests that only 15 percent of all
cases ended with a conviction. At the same time, the vast
majority, over 80 percent, or specifically, 83 percent of entrepreneurs
who faced criminal charges fully or partially lost their business –
they got harassed, intimidated, robbed and then released. This certainly
isn’t what we need in terms of a business climate. This is actually
the opposite, the direct destruction of the business
climate. I ask the investigative authorities
and the prosecutor’s office to pay special attention
to this.
I would
like to emphasise that prosecutors should make greater use
of the tools available to check the quality
of investigations. I know that discussions have been going
on for a long time about the prosecutor office’s needs.
As you know, we have separated the investigative authorities
and the prosecutor's office in order to ensure independent
investigations are carried out; it was a conscious decision. Today,
I remind you, the prosecutor’s office has the authority
to cancel a decision to institute criminal proceedings,
or waive the indictment, or even refuse to support the case
in court. We must learn to use what is available; only then we will
be able to analyse what is happening in practice.
In addition,
I believe that suspects in economic cases should be detained only
as a last resort measure; for the most part investigators
should opt for release on bail, travel restrictions or house
arrest. The role of law enforcement and the judicial system
is to protect the economy and community from fraud
and criminals, and to protect the rights, property
and dignity of all those who obey the law and conduct their
business honestly.
There
is one more point I’d like to make. Last year we announced
the so-called capital amnesty to return financial assets
to Russia. Yet, businesses seem in no hurry to take advantage
of that opportunity, which suggests that the procedure proposed is
too complicated, while guarantees it provides are still insufficient.
I follow the public discussions on the issue. The word
is, that what we have already done and the decisions we made
previously are slightly better than the solutions we’ve offered
in years past, but it is definitely not enough today. I ask
the Government to organise consultations, including further
consultations with the business community, with the Supreme Court,
with law enforcement agencies, and in short order make
the appropriate adjustments. I also suggest extending
the capital amnesty itself for another six months.
Colleagues,
the state will fund the necessary assistance to those who are
ready to go forward and become leaders. We are building such
a system in our dialogue with the business community based
on its requirements and the tasks facing our country.
The Industry
Development Fund is already supporting import substitution programmes. These
programmes are needed by entrepreneurs. I suggest increasing its
authorised capital by another 20 billion roubles.
We
are also guaranteeing stable tax rates and other basic terms
for investors who are ready to finance import substitution projects.
This is included in mechanisms such as the special investment
contract. I suggest granting the regions the right
to reduce profit tax to zero under such contracts. Some governors
directly request this to allow investors to cover their capital
outlays on developing new production lines.
Obviously,
we are aware of the regional governors’ concerns. The regions
should be motivated to consolidate their economic base, so
an increase in regional profits from implementing these projects
should not lead to a reduction in federal subsidies.
We
are ready to guarantee the demand for the goods produced
under these programmes and projects. I propose giving
the Government the right to purchase
on a non-competitive basis up to 30 percent
of the products manufactured under special investment contracts.
Whatever remains should go to the free markets, including those
abroad, to motivate these companies, to monitor the quality
of their products and reduce overheads.
As you
know, when other countries carried out these kinds of programmes,
the terms for state support were even tougher: it was mandatory
for a certain percentage of goods produced to be sold
abroad. What for? To motivate producers to manufacture quality
products.
We’re
saying that we will guarantee demand in our own market. Our terms are
somewhat different from those in other countries with tougher terms. That
said, we must assume that these products will be highly competitive
on the international market. Let me emphasise again that we will
support expressly competitive domestic production lines. No one should be
working under the illusion that under the guise of import
substitution it’s possible to build a substandard, out of date
product and pawn it off to the state or to our people
and make them pay a premium price for it. Russia needs companies
that are capable not only of providing the country with quality
products but also of taking on foreign markets. The Russian
Export Centre was established to help those who are ready for this
effort.
In addition,
I suggest making the growth of non-energy exports one
of the key indicators of the performance
of industry-related agencies and the Government
as a whole.
I think
it would be appropriate to implement the business community’s
initiative and create a technological development agency to help
companies acquire domestic and foreign patents and licenses
for engineering services. Access to foreign markets
and the expansion of Russian manufacturing should become
a natural strategy for the development of the nation’s
business sector and the entire Russian economy. We should put stereotypes
aside and believe in our own capabilities. If we work with this
attitude, we are certain to see a result.
Our
agriculture sector is a positive example. Just a decade ago we
imported almost half of our food products and critically depended
on imports, whereas now Russia has joined the exporters’ club. Last
year Russia’s agricultural exports totalled almost $20 billion. This is
a quarter more than our proceeds from arms sales or about one third
of our profits from gas exports. Our agriculture has made this leap
in a short but productive period. Many thanks to our rural
residents.
I believe
we should set a national goal — fully provide the internal
market with domestically produced foods by 2020. We are capable
of feeding ourselves from our own land, and importantly, we have
the water resources. Russia can become one of the world’s
largest suppliers of healthy, ecologically clean quality foods that some
Western companies have stopped producing long ago, all the more so since
global demand for such products continues to grow.
To fulfil
these ambitious goals, we need to concentrate our resources
on primary support for highly efficient farms. This approach should
underlie the programme for the development
of the agro-industrial complex. This includes large, medium and small
companies – all of them must be efficient. I would like
the Agriculture Ministry to pay special attention to this.
It
is necessary to put to use millions of hectares of arable
land that is now idle. They belong to large land owners, many of whom
show little interest in farming. How many years have we been talking about
this? Yet things are not moving forward. I suggest withdrawing misused
agricultural land from questionable owners and selling it
at an auction to those who can and want to cultivate
the land.
I would
like to ask the Government to prepare specific proposals,
including draft regulations and standards by June 1, 2016.
I would also like to ask the State Duma deputies and all
members of the Federal Assembly to make amendments to the related
laws over the next year and adopt laws to make this possible
at the next autumn session.
We
also need our own technology for the production, storage
and processing of agricultural produce, our own seed
and pedigree stock. This is a very important goal. We are still
vulnerable in these areas. I ask you to get leading research
centres, the Russian Academy of Sciences and businesses which
are successfully putting advanced technology into practice involved
in this process.
In my previous
Address, I announced the launch of the National Technology
Initiative, spanning 15–20 years, but practical work is already underway. It
shows that we have plenty of strong teams capable of offering
and following through on innovative ideas. In areas such
as neutron technology, robotics in aviation
and the transport sector in general, energy storage
and distribution systems, Russia has every chance of breaking through
to global markets in the near future, within the next few
years.
Development
institutions should be geared towards achieving priority goals, primarily those
related to technological modernisation. We have over two dozen
of them. Unfortunately, many of them, to put it bluntly, have
turned into dumping grounds for bad debts. It is essential
to streamline them and optimise the structure
and mechanisms of this work. I know that both
the Government and the Central Bank are actively working
on this.
We
should make a more active use of the investment potential
of domestic savings for economic modernisation. I ask
the Central Bank and the Government to submit proposals on the development
of the corporate bond market, something we have discussed many times.
It is essential to simplify the procedure for the issue
and acquisition of corporate bonds. To make it worthwhile
for investors, individuals to invest in the development
of the domestic real sector, I propose exempting the coupon
income on these bonds from taxation, including from income tax
for individuals.
Dozens
of major projects are being implemented or are about to be
launched in industry, agriculture, transport and housing
construction. They should have a positive impact not only on separate
sectors but also stimulate the comprehensive development of entire
territories. These are primarily private projects.
To expedite
their effective implementation it is important to make pinpoint amendments
to laws, lift administrative barriers and assist the development
of infrastructure and the process of entering foreign
markets. These issues often extend beyond the scope of just one
government agency, so I propose putting in place a mechanism
to support the most important projects. A special agency can be
established for this. I ask Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev
to submit proposals on the work of this agency.
Incidentally,
one such project could be the creation of major private Russian
companies that specialise in online trade so that Russian goods are
delivered via the Internet to all countries in the world.
We do have a great deal to deliver.
Colleagues,
we are interested in broad business cooperation with our foreign partners,
and we welcome investors who focus on long-term work
on the Russian market, even though the current circumstances
they face aren’t always favourable. We highly appreciate their positive
attitude to our country, and the fact that they see advantages
for growing their respective businesses in our country. Russia is
involved in integration processes designed to open additional avenues
for expanding economic ties with other countries.
We
have reached the next level of cooperation within the Eurasian
Economic Union by creating a common space, with free movement
of capital, goods and labour. We have reached a basic agreement
on combining Eurasian integration with the Chinese Silk Road Economic
Belt. A free trade zone with Vietnam was established. Next year, we will
host the Russia-ASEAN summit in Sochi, and I am sure we
will be able to work out a mutually beneficial agenda
for cooperation.
I propose
holding consultations, in conjunction with our colleagues from
the Eurasian Economic Union, with the SCO and ASEAN members,
as well as with the states that are about to join
the SCO, with the view of potentially forming an economic
partnership. Together, our states make up nearly a third
of the global economy in terms of purchasing power parity.
Such a partnership could initially focus on protecting investments,
streamlining procedures for the cross-border movement of goods,
joint development of technical standards for next-generation
technology products, and the mutual provision of access
to markets for both services and capital. Of course, this
partnership should be based on principles of equality and mutual
interest.
For Russia,
this partnership will open new possibilities for increasing exports
of food and energy, as well as offering services
in engineering, education, healthcare, and tourism
to the Asia-Pacific Region, allowing us to play the leading
role in forming new technology markets, and re-orienting major global
trade flows to Russia.
We
will continue to upgrade our transport infrastructure and expand
major logistic centres, such as the Azov-Black Sea
and the Murmansk transport hubs, modern ports in the Baltic
Sea and the Russian Far East. We will consolidate the system
of inter-regional air transport, including in northern
and Arctic regions. We will review in detail the situation with
inland waterways and river routes during a forthcoming State Council
meeting.
The Northern
Sea Route should become a link between Europe
and the Asia-Pacific Region. To enhance its competitiveness, we
will extend the preferential regime of the free port
of Vladivostok to key Far Eastern harbours, as requested
by the entrepreneurs who operate in this strategically important
Russian region.
The socioeconomic
development of this region is a major national priority. Investors
have shown great practical interest in the new methods
of operation we have proposed, including priority development areas.
I instruct
the Government to expedite decisions on levelling off energy
rates for the Far Eastern regions where they are considerably above
average national rates, and I urge the Parliament
to promptly hear the draft law on the free allocation
of land plots to people in the Far East.
Over
the past few years, major investments have been made
in the development of Khabarovsk and Vladivostok, and people
there have noticed the improvements. Komsomolsk-on-Amur must become one
more rapidly developing centre in the Far East. It is a city
with a rich history and modern high-tech industries, which turn out
civilian products that enjoy high demand and also work fruitfully
for the defence sector. But this city’s urban and social
infrastructure has been neglected.
I’m
referring to the city’s face and its sports, culture, healthcare
and education facilities, none of which are consistent with
the potential of Komsomolsk-on-Amur. This is why it is difficult
to attract talented young professionals there, which the regional
companies badly need. I believe that we can use resources under
the on-going programmes to address the problems
of Komsomolsk-on-Amur without delay. Of course, we can’t do this
overnight, but we at least must understand what we need to accomplish
and how fast work must proceed.
Colleagues,
we have a long-term agenda that must be independent of election
cycles and the prevailing situation. These strategic goals include
preserving the nation, bringing up our children and helping them
develop their talents, which constitutes the basis of the power
and future of any country, including Russia.
I’d
like to begin with demography. We’ve registered a natural increase
in population for the past three years. It has been modest, but
present nevertheless. What I would like to highlight is that,
according to forecasts, we should have seen a demographic collapse
due to the demographic echo of the 1990s, which
demographers have predicted, including at the UN. But this hasn’t
come to pass, primarily because half of the new-borns today are
second or third children. Russian families want to have children,
they believe in their future and in their country, and they
are confident that the state will help them.
The maternity
capital programme ends next year. Over 6.5 million families have enjoyed its
benefits, including in Crimea and Sevastopol. But we know that our
efforts in this sphere have not been sufficient to close
the demographic wound of the past.
Of course,
we realise that this will be hard on the budget, that
the programme needs major funding. We said in the past that we
need to analyse the figures to see if we can shoulder this
burden, as the financiers say, if we can guarantee the payment
of these allocations. Yes, we can do this, despite the current
challenges. I believe that we must extend the maternity capital
programme for at least two years.
A major
demographic policy measure is the development of preschool education.
Over the past three years, 800,000 new places have been created
at kindergartens. Practically in all parts of Russia, such
institutions are available for children between the ages
of three and seven. I know that the Prime Minister has paid
special, personal attention to this. Thank you, Mr Medvedev.
However,
so far, individual families – many families – continue
to encounter problems placing children in kindergartens. As long
as these problems exist, we cannot say that the issue has been closed.
I ask both the Government and regional authorities to pay
special attention to this.
Now,
healthcare. The main achievement of our entire policy in this
sphere is that we are seeing an increase in average life expectancy.
Over the past decade, it has increased by more than five years
and this year, according to preliminary estimates, should exceed 71
years. Nevertheless, there are still quite a few problems that have
to be dealt with.
Next
year, the Russian healthcare system will transition completely to an insurance-based
system. It is the direct responsibility of insurance companies
operating in the compulsory medical insurance system to uphold
patients’ rights, including in situations where they are refused free
medical care without a reason. If an insurance company does not do
this, it should be held accountable, including being banned from working
in the compulsory medical insurance system. I ask
the Government to ensure stringent oversight in this regard.
Next.
We have significantly expanded the scope of high-tech medical care.
It may be recalled that in 2005, 60,000 high-tech operations were
performed in Russia – 60,000! – compared to 715,000
in 2014. For the first time in the country’s history,
a significant part of such operations are carried out without there
being a waiting list, and this is indeed a major achievement.
However,
it is important to understand that certain operations are expensive.
As a general rule, they are performed at leading federal medical
centres and clinics. To finance such operations, I propose
establishing within the compulsory medical insurance system… We have
thought about this a great deal – whether we should provide
additional funding to the system. The deputies, government ministers
and governors know what happens in reality. The compulsory
medical insurance system is a territorial system and it supports
primarily territorial healthcare institutions. Naturally, underfinancing is
a matter of concern for the heads of major federal
clinics, where the majority of high-tech operations are in fact
performed. So, to finance these centres and perform such operations,
I propose instituting a special federal component within
the compulsory medical insurance system. I request that the relevant
amendments to the law be adopted during the spring session.
Even
so, this is not enough because people must not suffer while we make these
decisions. It is necessary to ensure continuous financing
of high-tech medical care, including with direct support from
the federal budget until this decision is made.
As you
also know, the ambulance service has been significantly upgraded
as part of the Healthcare national project. We have procured
a large number of modern ambulance vehicles and other equipment.
Naturally, as time goes on, the auto fleet needs maintenance
and renovation. Ten years have passed. This is the regions’
responsibility and they are duty bound to fulfil this task
and find the necessary reserves.
When
we did this 10 years ago, I remember well, we agreed that we will make
an initial injection of federal funding, and then
the regions will take over the responsibility and keep
the financing at a certain level. But this never happened, which
is unfortunate. I understand that there may be issues, but like
I said many times before, it is imperative to get our priorities
straight. It was the wrong thing to do to wait
for everything to fall apart, and then expect to be bailed
out again with the money from the federal budget. However, the way
things are now, it looks like we will have to do it again. But that's not
what we agreed upon. In any case, I ask the Government
and the regional authorities to get back to this issue
and resolve it jointly.
People
are complaining that they often cannot understand why certain hospitals,
schools, cultural or social centres and institutions are being closed
or merged. We keep talking about the need to restructure
the network, which is, in some cases, oversized. Yes, that’s
a fact. But we must proceed very carefully and be fully aware
of the fact that in order for us to be able
to reach certain indicators, closing rural medical centres is not always
the best option. Unfortunately, such things happen. People then have
to travel 100 kilometres to get medical attention. This is outrageous!
Please make sure that things are done right. I ask the Government
to draft and adopt a methodology for the most
efficient distribution of social institutions by March 1, 2016.
It should be mandatory for use in the regions. We must find
a legally valid formula that will allow us to do so.
In matters
such as providing assistance to the elderly or people with
disabilities, or supporting families and children, it is imperative
to show more trust in civil society and non-profit
organisations. Often, they work more effectively and efficiently, showing
genuine concern for the people. Also, there’s less red tape
in their work.
I would
like to propose a number of concrete solutions based
on the results of the active citizens’
forum Community, which took place in November.
First,
we will launch a special programme of presidential grants
to support non-profit organisations working in small towns
and villages.
Second,
the non-profit organisations that have established themselves
as reliable partners of the state will receive the legal
status of a ”non-profit organisation – provider of socially
useful services,“ and a number of incentives
and preferences. Finally, I believe that making up to 10 percent
of the regional and municipal social programmes’ funding
available to non-profit organisations is the right thing to do.
That way, non-profit organisations will be able to participate
in providing social services that are financed from the budget. We
believe we know well the current legislation, and we are not imposing
anything on anyone, but I’d like to ask heads
of the regions and municipalities to bear this in mind
in their work.
Colleagues,
as you may recall, there was a meeting with children in Sochi
at the Sirius Centre for Gifted Children
on September 1. Our children and young adults are really
interesting and goal-oriented people. We must do our best to make
sure that today's students get an excellent education, have opportunities
to be creative, choose a profession to their liking,
and are able to self-actualise regardless of their geographical
location or level of their parents’ income. All children must have
equal opportunities for a successful start in life.
Every
year, schools have more and more students. There will be 3.5 million more
of them over the next decade. It's great, it's very good, but it is
also important to make sure that this increase does not affect
the quality of education and learning conditions, and that
the current level continues to improve. Schools need more space
for students. I asked the Government to put together,
in conjunction with the regions, a specific plan of action
in this regard. A decision was made to release up to 50
billion rubles from the federal budget next year to repair, renovate
and build new schools.
I suggest
we take a broader look at these issues. Comfortable buildings are not
enough to get a good education. We need professional
and motivated teachers, ground-breaking educational programmes and,
of course, opportunities for the children to engage
in creative activities, sports and extracurricular activities.
Of course, we should use the best of what former Palaces
of Pioneers and young technicians' clubs had to offer. We must
build our work on an innovative and up-to-date foundation with
the participation of businesses, higher education institutions
and universities.
I will
now note a positive fact, such as the growing interest
of young people in engineering jobs and blue-collar occupations,
the vocations of the future. Competition for enrolment
in engineering universities has almost doubled in the past two
years. The WorldSkills International (WSI) will take place in Kazan
in 2019. By the way, Russia was the first to hold such
contests for young people aged 10 to 17 years. It is important
to make sure that such tournaments become a road map for school
children, for those who are just choosing their trades. We must establish
a whole system of national competitions for blue-collar workers.
I suggest we call this system “The Young Professionals.” This is
a very important task.
In a nutshell,
Russian schools, additional and professional education, and support
for children’s creative work should be aligned with the country’s
future, the requirements of people, young people in this case,
and the demands of the economy in the context
of its prospects. These guys will have to resolve even more
complicated tasks and should be ready to be the best. They
should become not only successful in their careers but also simply decent
people with a firm moral and ethical background.
Colleagues,
we have repeatedly faced a historical choice of which road
to take to further development. We crossed another milestone
in 2014 when Crimea and Sevastopol were reunified with Russia. Russia
declared a voce piena its status as a strong state with
a millennium-long history and great traditions, as a nation
consolidated by common values and common goals.
We
are acting with the same confidence now, at a time when Russia
is waging an expressly open, direct struggle against international
terrorism. We are making and implementing decisions, knowing that only we
can cope with the tasks facing us, but only if we act together.
I will
cite a quotation that seemed stunning even to me. These words were
said by a man who was far removed from politics, Dmitry Mendeleyev,
who expressed these thoughts more than a hundred years ago: “We will be
immediately destroyed if we are divided. Our strength lies in our unity,
our warriors, our benign domesticity that multiplies the numbers
of our people; our strength lies in the natural growth
of our intrinsic wealth and love of peace.” These are wonderful
words that are pertinent to us today.
At the same
time Russia is a part of a global world that is changing
rapidly. We understand well the complexity and scale of existing
problems – both foreign and domestic. There are always difficulties
and obstacles on the path to progress and development.
We will respond to all challenges; we will be creative
and productive; we will work for the common good
and for the sake of Russia. We will move forward
in unity and working together we will achieve success.
Thank
you.
(Anthem of the Russian Federation.)
OTHER
LINKS:
No comments:
Post a Comment